False Advertising Settlements

Travelers Insurance New Mexico UIM coverage class action settlement

Travelers Insurance has agreed to a class action settlement to resolve claims that it misled New Mexico policyholders about underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage.

$212,000 Hefty recyclable bags settlement

Reynolds Consumer Products has agreed to a $212,000 settlement to resolve allegations from the Arizona attorney general that the company misleadingly marketed and advertised its Hefty brand “Recycling” bags as recyclable when they are not accepted by Arizona municipal recycling programs.

iRhythm Technologies $45M Securities Class Action Settlement

iRhythm Technologies $45M Securities Class Action SettlementInvestors who bought iRhythm Technologies stock between July 25, 2022, and Aug. 9, 2024, may be eligible to claim cash from a class action settlement.iRhythm Technologies $45M Securities Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.William C. GendronEditor in ChiefPublishedAugust 3, 2026 11:45 AMUpdatedAugust 24, 2026Join the DiscussionInvestors who purchased or otherwise acquired iRhythm Technologies Inc. common stock between July 25, 2022, and Aug. 9, 2024, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.iRhythm Technologies Inc. and its chief executive officer agreed to pay $45 million to settle a securities class action lawsuit alleging they made materially false and misleading statements about the company's Zio AT heart monitoring device. The lawsuit claimed the statements misrepresented the device's near real-time data transmission capabilities, its appropriateness for high-risk patients and the accuracy of the data it reported.Who can file a claim?The settlement class includes all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired iRhythm Technologies Inc. common stock between July 25, 2022, and Aug. 9, 2024, inclusive, and suffered damages as a result.Additional detailsBoth individuals and entities can be class members.The settlement includes investors who held stock in their own name and those who held through a broker or other nominee.The beneficial owner, not the record owner, must sign the claim form.Joint owners must each sign the claim form.Agents, executors, administrators, guardians and trustees may submit claims on behalf of others and must provide proof of authority.Each separate legal entity or separately managed account must submit a separate claim.

Hain Celestial $35M Securities Class Action Settlement

Hain Celestial $35M Securities Class Action SettlementInvestors who bought Hain Celestial stock or options between Nov. 5, 2013, and Feb. 10, 2017, may be eligible to claim a payment from a class action settlement.Hain Celestial $35M Securities Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.William C. GendronEditor in ChiefPublishedAugust 3, 2026 2:47 PMUpdatedAugust 24, 2026Join the DiscussionInvestors who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Hain Celestial Group Inc. common stock, or exchange-traded call or put options on that stock, between Nov. 5, 2013, and Feb. 10, 2017, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.Hain Celestial and certain executives agreed to pay $35 million to settle a securities class action lawsuit alleging they made false and misleading statements about the company's financial results. The lawsuit claimed Hain gave its largest U.S. distributors concessions to buy product ahead of their normal purchasing patterns, did not disclose those concessions and prematurely recognized revenue on them.Who can file a claim?The settlement class includes all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Hain publicly traded common stock, or exchange-traded call or put options on that stock, between Nov. 5, 2013, and Feb. 10, 2017, inclusive, and experienced damages as a result.Additional detailsBoth individuals and entities can be class members.The settlement includes investors who held securities in their own name and those who held through a brokerage firm or other nominee.The actual beneficial owner or the legal representative of that owner must file the claim.Joint owners must each sign the claim form.Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators, legal representatives and trustees may submit claims on behalf of others and must provide proof of authority.

Rockley Photonics $10M Securities Class Action Settlement

Rockley Photonics $10M Securities Class Action SettlementInvestors who bought Rockley Photonics common stock between Aug. 11, 2021, and Jan. 23, 2023, may be eligible for a payment from a class action settlement.Rockley Photonics $10M Securities Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.Brandon RichardsLegal Content WriterPublishedAugust 31, 2026 10:55 AMUpdatedAugust 31, 2026Join the DiscussionInvestors who purchased or otherwise acquired Rockley Photonics Holdings Ltd. common stock between Aug. 11, 2021, and Jan. 23, 2023, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.Andrew Rickman, Mahesh Karanth and Richard Meier agreed to pay $10 million to settle a securities class action lawsuit alleging they made materially false and misleading statements about Rockley's revenue projections, the development and commercialization of its products, its relationships with key customers and its ability to fund operations. The lawsuit claimed those statements inflated the company's stock price and caused investor losses.Who can file a claim?The settlement includes all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Rockley Photonics Holdings Ltd. common stock between Aug. 11, 2021, and Jan. 23, 2023, inclusive, and were harmed as a result.Additional detailsBoth individuals and entities can be class members.The settlement includes investors who held shares in their own name and those who held through a broker or other nominee.The actual beneficial owner or a legal representative must submit the claim.Joint owners must each sign the claim form.Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees may submit claims on behalf of others and must provide proof of authority.

VSL#3 Probiotic $20M False Advertising Class Action Settlement

VSL#3 Probiotic $20M False Advertising Class Action SettlementIndividuals who bought VSL#3 probiotic between June 1, 2016, and June 19, 2019, may be eligible to claim up to $800 from a class action settlement.VSL#3 Probiotic $20M False Advertising Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.William C. GendronEditor in ChiefPublishedAugust 24, 2026 5:02 PMUpdatedAugust 24, 2026Join the DiscussionConsumers who purchased VSL#3 probiotic in the United States between June 1, 2016, and June 19, 2019, may qualify to submit a claim for up to $800 from a class action settlement.VSL Pharmaceuticals Inc., Leadiant Biosciences Inc. and Alfasigma USA Inc. agreed to pay $20 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging these companies misrepresented the clinical effectiveness of VSL#3, leading consumers to overpay for the product. Who can file a claim?The class includes anyone who bought VSL#3 for personal use between June 1, 2016, and June 19, 2019.How much is the VS#3 false advertising settlement payout?Class members can claim their payment with or without proof of purchase.Class members without proof of purchase: May claim $20 for one unit per household.Class members with proof of purchase: May claim $20 per unit for up to 40 units per household, a of maximum $800.Class members with a notice ID: May claim for the number of units reflected in the records, which counts as proof of purchase. If they have proof of additional purchases, they may claim additional units, up to 40.If the total value of valid claims is less than the available funds, the per-unit payment may be increased up to three times, to $60 per unit. If the total claims exceed the available funds, the per-unit payment will be reduced pro rata.

Lloyd’s of London $3.57M Insurance Class Action Settlement

Lloyd’s of London $3.57M Insurance Class Action SettlementConsumers who purchased Lloyd’s of London insurance between 1997 to 2025 may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.Lloyd’s of London $3.57M Insurance Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.William C. GendronEditor in ChiefPublishedAugust 13, 2026 2:02 PMUpdatedAugust 24, 2026Join the DiscussionCustomers who purchased or renewed insurance through certain Lloyd’s of London syndicates between Jan. 1, 1997, and April 15, 2025, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.Lloyd’s agreed to pay $3,570,000 to settle a class action lawsuit alleging certain syndicates engaged in deceptive practices by concealing a lack of competition in the Lloyd’s insurance market. The settlement resolves claims of violations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, civil conspiracy and unjust enrichment. Who can file a claim?The class includes all individuals and entities in the United States and its territories who purchased or renewed a contract of insurance (not reinsurance) between Jan. 1, 1997, and April 15, 2025, with syndicates 727, 2791, 1003, 2003 and 2020.The lawsuit involving Syndicate 2488 has not yet settled. Participation in this settlement does not affect the ability to obtain relief from this syndicate in the future.How much is the Lloyd's of London payout?The amount each class member can receive depends on the total amount of premiums the class member paid to the settling syndicates during the class period and the number of valid claims submitted. Each class member’s payment will be proportional to the total premiums they paid to the settling syndicates compared to the total premiums paid by all claimants.If a claimant’s calculated share is less than $10, they will not receive a payment.

Levoit Air Purifier $15M False Advertising Class Action Settlement

Levoit Air Purifier $15M False Advertising Class Action SettlementIndividuals who bought a Levoit Core or EverestAir air purifier or filter between Aug. 29, 2019, and Aug. 4, 2023, may qualify to claim $10 from a settlement.Levoit Air Purifier $15M False Advertising Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.Nicole AljetsEditor & Community ManagerPublishedSeptember 5, 2026 7:17 PMUpdatedSeptember 5, 2026Join the DiscussionConsumers who purchased a Levoit-branded Core or EverestAir air purifier or a replacement filter with “True HEPA,” “HEPA,” and/or “H13” language in the United States between Aug. 29, 2019, and Aug. 4, 2023, may be eligible to submit a claim for $10 from a class action settlement.Vesync (US) Corp. has agreed to pay $15 million to settle a class action lawsuit that alleged the company made false or misleading claims about the filtration capabilities of certain Levoit-branded air purifiers and replacement filters. Who can file a claim?Class members must meet the following criteria:They purchased a Levoit-branded Core or EverestAir air purifier and/or a replacement filter in the United States.The product packaging or advertising included the terms “True HEPA,” “HEPA,” and/or “H13."The purchase was made between Aug. 29, 2019, and Aug. 4, 2023.Each class member may submit only one claim, regardless of the number of qualifying products purchased.Who is excluded from the class?Consumers who purchased products directly from Vesync’s website or app do not qualify for the settlement.How much are settlement payments?Cash payment: Class members can submit a claim to receive a $10 payment. The total settlement fund for payments is $15 million. If the total value of the claims submitted exceeds the settlement amount, payments will be reduced.

Twist Bioscience $17M Securities Class Action Settlement

Twist Bioscience $17M Securities Class Action SettlementInvestors who bought Twist Bioscience stock between Dec. 20, 2018, and Nov. 15, 2022, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.Twist Bioscience $17M Securities Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.William C. GendronEditor in ChiefPublishedSeptember 8, 2026 10:44 AMUpdatedSeptember 8, 2026Join the DiscussionInvestors who purchased or otherwise acquired Twist Bioscience Corp. common stock between Dec. 20, 2018, and Nov. 15, 2022, or in the company's December 2020 secondary offering at $110 per share may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.Twist Bioscience and certain executives agreed to pay $17 million to settle a securities class action lawsuit alleging they made false and misleading statements about the company's production process, product quality and accounting. The lawsuit claimed those statements inflated the price of Twist common stock and caused investor losses when corrective information reached the market on Nov. 15, 2022.Who can file a claim?The settlement class includes all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Twist common stock in the December 2020 offering pursuant to the 2020 registration statement or between Dec. 20, 2018, and Nov. 15, 2022, inclusive, and suffered damages as a result.Additional detailsBoth individuals and entities can be class members.The settlement includes investors who held stock in their own name and those who held through a broker or other nominee.The beneficial owner or a legal representative must submit the claim.Joint owners must each sign the claim form.Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees may submit claims on behalf of others and must provide proof of authority.

Elon Musk Twitter Securities Class Action Verdict

Elon Musk Twitter Securities Class Action Verdict Investors who sold Twitter stock or options between May 13, 2022, and Oct. 4, 2022, may be eligible to claim compensation from a jury verdict.Elon Musk Twitter Securities Class Action Verdict Weekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.William C. GendronEditor in ChiefPublishedJuly 31, 2026 11:44 AMUpdatedAugust 24, 2026Join the DiscussionInvestors who sold publicly traded Twitter Inc. common stock or call options or purchased publicly traded Twitter put options between May 13, 2022, and Oct. 4, 2022, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action verdict.A federal jury found Elon Musk violated the federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements about his acquisition of Twitter Inc. It also determined Twitter's stock price artificially deflated during that period. Who can file a claim?The class includes all persons and entities who sold the publicly traded stock or call options or purchased the put options of Twitter Inc. between May 13, 2022, and Oct. 4, 2022, inclusive, and suffered damages as a result.Additional detailsBoth individuals and entities can be class members.The class includes investors who held securities in their own name and those who held through a nominee or brokerage firm.The actual beneficial owner or the legal representative of that owner must file the claim.Joint owners must each sign the claim form.Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees may submit claims on behalf of others and must provide proof of authority.How much can class members get?

Dr. Squatch $9M False Advertising Class Action Settlement

Dr. Squatch $9M False Advertising Class Action SettlementConsumers who bought Dr. Squatch products labeled as "natural" between Nov. 1, 2018, and Aug. 29, 2026, may qualify to claim up to $12.50 from a settlement.Dr. Squatch $9M False Advertising Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.Nicole AljetsEditor & Community ManagerPublishedSeptember 1, 2026 4:22 PMUpdatedSeptember 1, 2026Join the DiscussionIndividuals who purchased Dr. Squatch products labeled as “natural” in the United States between Nov. 1, 2018, and Aug. 29, 2026, may be eligible to submit a claim for a cash payment from a class action settlement.Dr. Squatch LLC agreed to pay $9 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging the company misrepresented certain products as natural even though they may have contained synthetic ingredients. Who can file a claim?Class members are individuals who purchased a Dr. Squatch product from any retailer online or in-store in the United States labeled as "natural" between Nov. 1, 2018, and Aug. 29, 2026. Covered products include:Men’s Natural Bar SoapMen’s Natural Beard OilMen’s Natural Beard Oil & CologneMen’s Natural LotionMen’s Natural Body WashMen’s Natural CologneMen’s Natural Cologne OilMen’s Natural ConditionerMen’s Natural DeodorantMen’s Natural Face WashMen’s Natural Hand SanitizerMen’s Natural Hand SoapMen’s Natural Lip BalmMen’s Natural Lotion to PowderMen’s Natural Post ShaveMen’s Natural ShampooMen’s Natural Shave ButterMen’s Natural ToothpasteMen’s Natural WipesClass members can submit only one claim per household.How much are settlement payments?Class members can receive $0.50 per eligible product and claim one or both of the following:With proof of purchase: Class members with proof of purchase can claim up to 20 products for a maximum of $10.

Dr. Squatch $9M "Natural" Settlement — $0.50 a Product, No Receipt

No Proof False Advertising Dr. Squatch $9M "Natural" Settlement — $0.50 a Product, No Receipt $0.50 for every Dr. Squatch soap, deodorant or body wash you bought since November 2018 — five on your word alone, or 25 in total with receipts.

Kornit Digital $19.5M Securities Class Action Settlement

Kornit Digital $19.5M Securities Class Action SettlementInvestors who bought Kornit Digital ordinary shares between Feb. 17, 2021, and July 5, 2022, may be eligible for a cash payment from a $19.5 million settlement.Kornit Digital $19.5M Securities Class Action SettlementWeekly NewsletterClass actions settlements delivered to your inbox.Thank you! Check your inbox for a welcome email.Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.William C. GendronEditor in ChiefPublishedAugust 24, 2026 12:46 PMUpdatedAugust 24, 2026Join the DiscussionInvestors who bought or otherwise acquired Kornit Digital Ltd. ordinary shares between Feb. 17, 2021, and July 5, 2022, or acquired shares traceable to the company's November 2021 secondary offering, may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a class action settlement.Kornit Digital Ltd. and certain executives agreed to pay $19.5 million to settle a securities class action lawsuit alleging they made false and misleading statements about the company's business and operations. The lawsuit claimed statements about Kornit's service contracts, the health of its business and a pull-forward of revenue inflated the share price until corrective disclosures in May and July 2022.Who can file a claim?The settlement class includes all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Kornit ordinary shares between Feb. 17, 2021, and July 5, 2022, inclusive, or pursuant and/or traceable to Kornit's secondary offering of ordinary shares in November 2021.Additional detailsBoth individuals and entities can be class members.The settlement includes investors who held shares in their own name and those who held through a broker or other nominee.The beneficial owner, not the record owner, must sign the claim form.Joint owners must each sign the claim form.Agents, executors, administrators, guardians and trustees may submit claims on behalf of others and must provide proof of authority.

Starbuck’s Coffee Ethically Sourced Class Action

CONSUMER LAW GROUP has filed a class action against Starbuck’s for misleading consumers about the ethical sourcing of its coffee products and the undisclosed presence of volatile organic compounds.

Instacart Misleading Prices and Fees Canadian Class Action

Instacart Drip Pricing and Double Ticketing Canadian Class Action

Web Travel Class Action

James Hardie Class Action

Evenflo Big Kid Booster Car Seat Canadian Class Action

Evenflo Big Kid Booster Car Seat Canadian Class Action

Ford F-150 Lightning EV Canadian Class Action

CONSUMER LAW GROUP has instituted a Canadian class action lawsuit against Ford and Qmerit for the following alleged misrepresentations:

CarShield Settlement

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block December 2025 FTC sends checks to eligible people who paid for a vehicle service contract The FTC is sending 168,179 checks totaling more than $9.6 million to eligible people who paid CarShield for a vehicle service contract between September 2019 and September 2024, and had their claim denied.According to the FTC, CarShield ads and telemarketing promised that “you’ll never pay for expensive car repairs again.

Restoro-Reimage Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block March 2026 FTC sends checks to people who paid for computer repair services The FTC is sending checks to people who paid for computer repair services from tech support companies Restoro and Reimage.The FTC sued Restoro and Reimage, and the companies paid money to settle. According to the lawsuit, these companies used misleading online ads and fake Microsoft Windows pop-up screens to scare people into paying for computer repair services.

Razer Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block January 2025 Products Zephyr face masks FTC sends full refund payments to people who paid for Zephyr face masks The FTC is sending 6,764 payments totaling more than $1 million to people who bought Zephyr face masks from Razer.According to the FTC, Razer falsely advertised their Zephyr face masks as N95-grade masks. That wasn’t true, and the masks were never certified as N95.To settle the FTC’s charges, the company paid money and agreed to stop making misleading health claims.

List of Class Actions

We are a Canada-wide class action law firm with offices in Montreal, Quebec and Ottawa, Ontario. If you are Canadian, the following class actions may be of interest to you.

Star Entertainment Group Limited Class Action

You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox x Current class actionsThe Star Entertainment Group Limited Class ActionSlater and Gordon, as instructed by the lead plaintiff, commenced a group proceeding (class action) against The Star Entertainment Group Limited (SGR.AX) (Star) on 29 March 2022. Register FAQsBackground to the proceedingStar has held itself out as an ethical and responsible casino operator that complied with its legal and regulatory obligations.However, widespread media reporting in October 2021 revealed that Star had cultivated high roller players who were allegedly associated with criminal or foreign-influence operations and had failed to comply with its obligations under anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws.In response to those media reports, Star’s share price declined by more than 25 per cent, wiping more than $1 billion from the company’s value.In 2021, the NSW Independent Casino Commission announced it would appoint Adam Bell SC to undertake a review of The Star and its Sydney Casino in order to determine if it was suitable to hold a license in NSW. On 17 October 2022 the NICC announced it had suspended The Star’s licence indefinitely, fined the casino $100 million, and appointed a manager. The NICC has since extended the suspension of The Star’s licence and the term of the appointed manager on multiple occasions, most recently to 30 September 2026.The AllegationsThis class action alleges that Star made misleading representations relating to its compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) and associated instruments (AML/CTF Laws).

Hopper Misleading Prices and Fees Canadian Class Action

Hopper Misleading Prices and Fees Canadian Class Action

Grubhub Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC Sends More than $23.8 Million to Drivers and Diners Harmed by Grubhub’s Deceptive Advertising Claims and Other Unlawful Conduct August 12, 2026 Press Release FTC Sends More than $23.8 Million to Drivers and Diners Harmed by Grubhub’s Deceptive Advertising Claims and Other Unlawful Conduct August 12, 2026 Aug18 How To Help Protect Your Small Business from Scams Tuesday, August 18, 2026 | 2:00PM Aug18 How To Help Protect Your Small Business from Scams Tuesday, August 18, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block August 2026 FTC sends payments to eligible Grubhub users The FTC is sending 640,038 payments totaling more than $23.8 million to Grubhub drivers and diners harmed by the food delivery platform’s deceptive claims or misleading and unlawful conduct.According to the FTC and the Illinois Attorney General, Grubhub’s alleged conduct included deceiving delivery drivers about the earnings they could expect from delivering food, and blocking diners from their accounts, preventing them from redeeming gift cards.If you get a check, please cash it within 90 days.If you get a PayPal payment, please accept it within 30 days.

Uber One Membership Canadian Class Action

CONSUMER LAW GROUP has filed a class action against Uber for alleged deceptive practices related to its Uber One subscription, which deploy misleading enrollment, billing and automatic renewal schemes intended to induce consumers to unwittingly enroll in subscriptions. Consumers are routinely misled about key terms of subscriptions, including the timing of charges, renewal conditions, cancellation policies and the true savings and benefits.

Ansell Limited Class Action

You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox x Current class actionsAnsell Limited Class Action Register Interest FAQsWhen did Slater and Gordon issue proceedings? Slater and Gordon, as instructed by the lead plaintiff, commenced a group proceeding (class action) against Ansell Limited (ASX:ANN) (Ansell) on 9 August 2023.I am/was an Ansell shareholder, Is this relevant to me?Any person who purchased shares in Ansell at any point between 24 August 2021 to 28 January 2022 (inclusive) may have a claim against Ansell.You are automatically a group member if you purchased shares in Ansell, and suffered a loss, during the period 24 August 2021 to 28 January 2022 (inclusive).If you do not wish to participate in the group proceeding, there will be an opportunity for you to opt out of the class action at a future time.If you do wish to participate in the group proceeding and be entitled to receive compensation if the claim is successful, you will likely be required to formally register your claim at a future time.You will receive further information about the opt out process and the registration process explaining these options, and any steps that you are required to take at a future date.How do I express my interest?To keep updated as the case progresses, register your interest through the form here. It does not and will not cost you anything.Register your interestIf you purchased Ansell shares between 24 August 2021 and 28 January 2022 (inclusive) you may register your interest by filling out the form by clicking the button below. RegisterWhat are the allegations?

James Hardie Class Action Investigation

Paladin Energy Class Action

You web browser may not be properly supported. To use this site and all its features we recommend using the latest versions of Chrome, Safari or Firefox x Current class actionsPaladin Energy Class Action Register FAQsBackgroundOn 16 April 2025, Slater and Gordon, on the instructions of the lead plaintiff, started a class action in the Supreme Court of Victoria against uranium miner Paladin Energy Limited (ASX: PDN) (Paladin).The case is brought on behalf of investors who say they suffered financial loss after buying Paladin shares between 27 June 2024 and 25 March 2025 (inclusive).The claim alleges that, during this period, Paladin:made misleading statements to the market, andbreached its continuous disclosure obligations as an ASX‑listed company,in breach of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the ASIC Act 2001 (Cth).Who is included in the class action?This class action is brought on behalf of people and entities who purchased Paladin shares between 27 June 2024 and 25 March 2025 (inclusive).If you bought Paladin shares in that period and would like to receive updates and be assisted to participate in the class action, you can register your interest using the form below.Information we will ask you forThe registration form will ask you to provide:The date, number of shares, price per share and total value of all purchases and sales of Paladin shares between 27 June 2024 and 25 March 2025 (inclusive)The number of Paladin shares you already held at the start of trading on 27 June 2024Documents showing those transactions (for example, broker statements or trade confirmations)If you have any questions about what information to provide, please email us at paladin@slatergordon.com.au.

James Hardie Shareholder Class Action

TFI International (TFII) Stock Price Drop Canadian Class Action

TFI International (TFII) Stock Price Drop Canadian Class Action

Financial services, mis-selling and shareholder claims

Contact us to find out more or to discuss your potential claim

Adobe Subscription Plan Canadian Class Action

CONSUMER LAW GROUP has filed a Canadian class action against Adobe Systems Canada Inc. and Adobe, Inc. for alleged deceptive practices related to its subscription services, which deploy misleading enrollment and automatic renewal schemes intended to induce consumers to unwittingly enroll in costly subscriptions. Consumers are routinely misled about key terms of subscriptions, including the duration of subscriptions, renewal conditions, and cancellation policies.

Apple iPhones 15 and 16 AI Canadian Class Action

Apple iPhones 15 and 16 AI Canadian Class Action

University of Phoenix Settlement

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block September 2025 The FTC is sending payments to eligible University of Phoenix students. According to the FTC, the University of Phoenix relied on deceptive advertising to attract students, falsely claiming to work with employers such as Microsoft, Twitter, Adobe, and Yahoo to create job opportunities for University of Phoenix students and tailoring its curriculum for the job needs of such companies.The FTC previously sent payments in March 2021 and July 2023, resulting in more than $48.

RevMountain Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block August 2025 FTC sends second payment to people who lost money to a deceptive marketing scheme The FTC is sending a second round of payments to people who were charged by RevMountain LLC, a marketing company that promised low-cost trials for tooth whiteners and other products but charged expensive hidden fees.

Consumer Health Benefits Association Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block August 2025 FTC sends second payment to people who lost money to a medical discount scheme The FTC is sending a second round of payments to people who paid Consumer Health Benefits Association (CHBA) for deceptive medical discount plans sold as health insurance.The FTC sued CHBA, alleging that the company sold misleading medical discount plans to people looking for health insurance and made it hard for customers to get refunds or cancel their plans.

I Works Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block May 2025 FTC sends additional refunds to people charged by I Works The FTC is sending payments to people who paid I Works for government-grant and money-making products.The FTC sued I Works for false advertising and for billing customers without their consent. The company ran multiple online campaigns that falsely advertised that federal grants were generally available for personal use and that people could make a lot of money using I Works products.

DeVry Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block May 2024 FTC sends payment to people harmed by deceptive advertising claims The FTC is sending payments to students who were harmed by DeVry’s deceptive claims and previously received a check which they did not cash.According to the FTC, DeVry’s advertisements made deceptive claims about the likelihood that graduates would find jobs in their fields and earn more after graduation than those graduating with bachelor’s degrees from other colleges or universities.

Warrior Trading Refunds

Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block November 2024 FTC sends second payment to people who paid for investment programs The FTC is sending a second round of payments to customers who paid for Warrior Trading’s investment programs.According to the FTC’s lawsuit, Warrior Trading made misleading and unrealistic claims that its day trading "system" would result in big investment gains for customers.